Counter Cyclical Program in Adams County, Mississippi, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 113
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Adams County, Mississippi totaled $4,850,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Big River Farms | Natchez, MS 39121 | $1,128,752 |
2 | Coles Creek Planting Co | Natchez, MS 39120 | $1,058,491 |
3 | Rosedale Planting Co | Church Hill, MS 39120 | $838,545 |
4 | Lake Mary Planting Company LLC | Jackson, MS 39211 | $243,169 |
5 | Davidson Farms | Natchez, MS 39120 | $199,528 |
6 | Ross Dunbar Mcgehee | Natchez, MS 39120 | $120,033 |
7 | David A Guido | Natchez, MS 39120 | $111,245 |
8 | Sue Guido | Natchez, MS 39120 | $111,245 |
9 | Louis E Guedon II Children Irrevo | Church Hill, MS 39120 | $104,892 |
10 | Kenneth L Isbell Sr | Natchez, MS 39121 | $99,095 |
11 | R Michael Guedon | Church Hill, MS 39120 | $88,075 |
12 | James M Sessions III | Woodville, MS 39669 | $87,179 |
13 | James Cattle & Land Co | Fort Worth, TX 76147 | $75,360 |
14 | I And B Plantation | Natchez, MS 39121 | $74,798 |
15 | Carolyn S Kee | Woodville, MS 39669 | $72,070 |
16 | Jms Properties Lp | Natchez, MS 39120 | $64,698 |
17 | Armstrong Family Farm Partnership | Natchez, MS 39120 | $52,655 |
18 | Tensas Parish Farms LLC | Natchez, MS 39121 | $40,608 |
19 | Emile L Guedon | Church Hill, MS 39120 | $40,147 |
20 | Leonard Lester Stockett | Woodville, MS 39669 | $30,412 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>