Total Conservation Programs in Clay County, Mississippi, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 650

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Clay County, Mississippi totaled $24,361,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
1Tkach Land PartnershipWest Point, MS 39773$1,011,386
2Paul Bert BrandWest Point, MS 39773$794,900
3B Bryan Farms IncWest Point, MS 39773$771,097
4Rhonda B JollyHouston, MS 38851$665,664
5Robley E Wooten JrWest Point, MS 39773$568,797
6Jay H SchertzLowpoint, IL 61545$567,035
7Donald R DepriestColumbus, MS 39703$507,015
8Ralph P And Tanya J Dexter Dba D And D FarmWest Point, MS 39773$430,942
9L C Kellogg JrWest Point, MS 39773$415,332
10Rosalyn B CampbellBlue Springs, MS 38828$396,043
11Walker Farms LLCPheba, MS 39755$371,229
12F B Wiygul SrColumbus, MS 39705$351,824
13Jimmy GreenMadison, MS 39110$347,108
14Toxey Daniel Haas IIIWest Point, MS 39773$343,111
15Donald C DiminoWest Point, MS 39773$342,659
16Macon W Gravlee JrColumbus, MS 39701$317,558
17Mississippi State University FounMississippi State, MS 39762$309,506
18Kenneth D & Patsy C O'brian Revocable TrustCedarbluff, MS 39741$256,880
19Will Frank Walker EstatePheba, MS 39755$249,685
20Kenneth DillWest Point, MS 39773$228,992

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag