Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Union County, Mississippi, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 175
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Union County, Mississippi totaled $563,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lamar Frazier | New Albany, MS 38652 | $44,022 |
2 | Pannell Farms Ptrn | New Albany, MS 38652 | $42,607 |
3 | Union Cattle Company LLC | New Albany, MS 38652 | $38,876 |
4 | Jeffrey B Morris | Myrtle, MS 38650 | $36,910 |
5 | Bill O'callaghan | Blue Springs, MS 38828 | $28,813 |
6 | Willard Farms LLC | Etta, MS 38627 | $24,446 |
7 | Bricyn Farms LLC | New Albany, MS 38652 | $23,624 |
8 | Collins Farm | Myrtle, MS 38650 | $23,201 |
9 | Robert Scott Porter | Myrtle, MS 38650 | $20,626 |
10 | Edward R Grant | New Albany, MS 38652 | $19,087 |
11 | Larry Coker | Blue Springs, MS 38828 | $18,864 |
12 | Daniel Pitts | New Albany, MS 38652 | $16,451 |
13 | Eugene Chism | Ripley, MS 38663 | $15,540 |
14 | Joseph Mcgaha | New Albany, MS 38652 | $15,435 |
15 | Phil D Adair | New Albany, MS 38652 | $14,717 |
16 | John R Mcgaha | Myrtle, MS 38650 | $13,346 |
17 | Kerry L Coker | Blue Springs, MS 38828 | $13,000 |
18 | Jonathan W Callicutt | New Albany, MS 38652 | $12,173 |
19 | Terry L Pitts | New Albany, MS 38652 | $11,781 |
20 | Emilee Young | Dumas, MS 38625 | $10,930 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>