Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Bates County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 630
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Bates County, Missouri totaled $8,708,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Summit Feeders LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $348,139 |
2 | James M Smith | Butler, MO 64730 | $168,221 |
3 | Round Prairie Land & Cattle LLC | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $151,555 |
4 | Leland Oliver Burch | Butler, MO 64730 | $139,700 |
5 | Gary Cook | Butler, MO 64730 | $121,879 |
6 | Cheryl Jane Cook | Butler, MO 64730 | $121,496 |
7 | James N Hertzog | Butler, MO 64730 | $104,819 |
8 | Kim Lampkin Diehl | Butler, MO 64730 | $96,631 |
9 | Champlin Cattle Co LLC | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $88,874 |
10 | Lbl Seider Farms | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $87,687 |
11 | Yarick Farms | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $85,634 |
12 | Brent N Bettels | Amoret, MO 64722 | $84,380 |
13 | Henry Lynn Wendleton | Butler, MO 64730 | $83,323 |
14 | Heiman Farms LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $80,622 |
15 | M & W Farms Inc | Butler, MO 64730 | $79,086 |
16 | Bf Cattle Co LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $78,850 |
17 | Brown Farms Eddie Inc | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $78,043 |
18 | Doug Cox Farms Inc | Butler, MO 64730 | $76,552 |
19 | Brett Allan Harkrader | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $75,771 |
20 | Robert A Christopher | Butler, MO 64730 | $74,919 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>