Emergency Conservation Program in Caldwell County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 24
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Caldwell County, Missouri totaled $43,776 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Sprouse Bros | Braymer, MO 64624 | $8,903 |
2 | Robert L & Karla D Kincaid Trust | Braymer, MO 64624 | $4,275 |
3 | Sprouse Farms Inc | Braymer, MO 64624 | $3,873 |
4 | Gregory Potts | Lees Summit, MO 64082 | $3,023 |
5 | Steven Potts | Hamilton, MO 64644 | $2,828 |
6 | Edward B Estabrook | Breckenridge, MO 64625 | $2,700 |
7 | Princess Barchers Coughlin | Kansas City, MO 64119 | $2,700 |
8 | S & P Farms LLC | Richmond, MO 64085 | $2,610 |
9 | Joseph C Graham | Hamilton, MO 64644 | $2,221 |
10 | Marshall Stonum | Lathrop, MO 64465 | $1,600 |
11 | Akey Farms Inc | Cameron, MO 64429 | $1,584 |
12 | Mary A Barber Revocable Trust | Blue Springs, MO 64015 | $1,575 |
13 | George Irving Alden | Hamilton, MO 64644 | $1,108 |
14 | Steven W Grooms | Kidder, MO 64649 | $1,004 |
15 | William E And Billie L Pollard Trust | Cowgill, MO 64637 | $812 |
16 | Joe Delane Kleeman | Braymer, MO 64624 | $789 |
17 | Coleen Winholtz | Independence, MO 64057 | $608 |
18 | Dean Estabrook | Breckenridge, MO 64625 | $335 |
19 | Michael E Kleeman | Braymer, MO 64624 | $228 |
20 | Matthew D Kleeman | Braymer, MO 64624 | $227 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>