Total Conservation Programs in Holt County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 603
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Holt County, Missouri totaled $16,363,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Harold W Andersen | Omaha, NE 68124 | $678,544 |
2 | Jerry D Fink Declaration Of Trust | Oregon, MO 64473 | $628,297 |
3 | Squaw Creek Gun Club Inc | Saint Joseph, MO 64506 | $332,042 |
4 | Evan Copsey II Trust | Maitland, MO 64466 | $320,762 |
5 | Myron Noellsch & Sons Inc | Oregon, MO 64473 | $298,954 |
6 | Peggy S Kneale | Maitland, MO 64466 | $282,557 |
7 | Radley Family Limited Partnership | Oregon, MO 64473 | $277,482 |
8 | Big Deer LLC | Hot Springs Village, AR 71909 | $245,736 |
9 | Travis Frank Milne | Oregon, MO 64473 | $235,037 |
10 | Lk Farms LLC | Graham, MO 64455 | $234,339 |
11 | Michael L Polsgrove | Oregon, MO 64473 | $230,950 |
12 | Rodney Fink | Macomb, IL 61455 | $221,822 |
13 | Wayne Eldon Kurtz | Oregon, MO 64473 | $220,927 |
14 | B & Y Outdoors LLC | Perrysburg, OH 43551 | $189,671 |
15 | Duane Baker | Oregon, MO 64473 | $188,101 |
16 | Agri Concerns Inc | Oregon, MO 64473 | $185,877 |
17 | Heartland Heritage LLC | Maryville, MO 64468 | $184,827 |
18 | Brett Aaron Derr | Forest City, MO 64451 | $183,077 |
19 | Nimrod Farms Inc | Lincoln, NE 68527 | $175,790 |
20 | Lyle Derr Farm Company | Forest City, MO 64451 | $172,177 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>