Total Commodity Programs in Lawrence County, Missouri, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 259
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Lawrence County, Missouri totaled $2,409,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kingsley Brothers LLC | Miller, MO 65707 | $186,317 |
| 2 | Renkoski Land And Cattle LLC | Pierce City, MO 65723 | $171,027 |
| 3 | Art Mattlage | Pierce City, MO 65723 | $87,621 |
| 4 | Eula Mae Thomas | Golden City, MO 64748 | $59,338 |
| 5 | Jackie L Thomas | Golden City, MO 64748 | $59,338 |
| 6 | Galen Thomas | Springfield, MO 65802 | $57,470 |
| 7 | Glen Moennig | Pierce City, MO 65723 | $57,457 |
| 8 | Krueger Dairy | Verona, MO 65769 | $46,627 |
| 9 | Roger Duane Moennig | Pierce City, MO 65723 | $45,973 |
| 10 | Spree Farms LLC | Mount Vernon, MO 65712 | $40,713 |
| 11 | Matthew Jay Kingsley | Miller, MO 65707 | $39,618 |
| 12 | Groves View Dairy | Billings, MO 65610 | $36,552 |
| 13 | Matthew Duane Woodward | Mount Vernon, MO 65712 | $36,134 |
| 14 | Dennis Flehmer | Pierce City, MO 65723 | $35,383 |
| 15 | Dale L Richardson | Ash Grove, MO 65604 | $34,316 |
| 16 | Dennis Edward Worm | Monett, MO 65708 | $34,240 |
| 17 | Karl J Wilke | Mount Vernon, MO 65712 | $34,057 |
| 18 | Jerry Wayne Mcknight | Monett, MO 65708 | $33,580 |
| 19 | Nathan Vernon Dostal | Mount Vernon, MO 65712 | $33,432 |
| 20 | Roger Lee Bowles | Miller, MO 65707 | $33,046 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf