Direct Payment Program in Livingston County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,451
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Livingston County, Missouri totaled $23,893,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hrb Farming Partnership | Mooresville, MO 64664 | $843,147 |
2 | Marshall Meservey Farms Inc | Chula, MO 64635 | $429,793 |
3 | Randy Jay Price | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $419,567 |
4 | Feeney Farm Inc | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $391,177 |
5 | K Farms Inc | Chula, MO 64635 | $332,454 |
6 | Benjamin Andrew Price | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $332,081 |
7 | Richard J Snyder | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $324,154 |
8 | Paul Steele Revocable Trust | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $312,654 |
9 | Sunrise Farms Inc | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $291,609 |
10 | Ryan Dean Foster | Hale, MO 64643 | $253,606 |
11 | D W Jones Farm Inc | Dawn, MO 64638 | $252,400 |
12 | Charles Ronald Haas | Chula, MO 64635 | $247,573 |
13 | Ronald Bowyer | Meadville, MO 64659 | $246,321 |
14 | C D Jones Land & Cattle Co Inc | Dawn, MO 64638 | $243,712 |
15 | Robert Cleo Howe | Wheeling, MO 64688 | $239,562 |
16 | Hayen Farms Inc | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $235,284 |
17 | David N Walker Revocable Trust | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $215,278 |
18 | Terry - Terry M Smit Michael Smit | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $195,709 |
19 | Albertson Farms Inc | Wheeling, MO 64688 | $194,023 |
20 | Sharon K Reeter | Chula, MO 64635 | $193,606 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>