Counter Cyclical Program in Mississippi County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 775
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Mississippi County, Missouri totaled $6,870,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Barnett Farms Inc | Bertrand, MO 63823 | $289,837 |
2 | R J S Burke Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $151,600 |
3 | C And D Glenn Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $126,621 |
4 | Burke Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $118,718 |
5 | Brad Finley Hequembourg | Charleston, MO 63834 | $114,019 |
6 | Eleanor Susan Hequembourg | Charleston, MO 63834 | $110,919 |
7 | Jem Farms Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $104,407 |
8 | Mrm Farms Partnership | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $93,204 |
9 | M & M Ag Investments | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $90,760 |
10 | Moreton Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $88,082 |
11 | Sevic Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $87,237 |
12 | Stallings Brothers | Charleston, MO 63834 | $85,786 |
13 | Deline Farms Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $75,978 |
14 | Burke Bros & Co Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $73,606 |
15 | Dan Duenne Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $67,944 |
16 | French Farms LLC | Bertrand, MO 63823 | $67,575 |
17 | Mt Level Farms Co Inc | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $66,524 |
18 | Abc Farms Inc | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $66,171 |
19 | Wolf Island Farms Inc | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $64,441 |
20 | Carl Simpkins Jr Farms | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $62,835 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>