Total Disaster Programs in New Madrid County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,266
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $16,928,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Henry Brands & Sons Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $286,862 |
| 2 | Bobby Howell Aycock Jr | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $203,544 |
| 3 | Milus Gary Wallace | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $202,982 |
| 4 | Vernon Ray Fowler | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $189,496 |
| 5 | Bill Turner | Gideon, MO 63848 | $164,464 |
| 6 | Virgil W Lawfield | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $158,368 |
| 7 | Robert Henry | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $148,307 |
| 8 | Earnest Lee Minehart | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $147,303 |
| 9 | Barry L Richardson Jr Farms | Marston, MO 63866 | $134,608 |
| 10 | David L Hunter Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $122,615 |
| 11 | Fletchers Gin Inc | Gideon, MO 63848 | $119,948 |
| 12 | Hayes Farm | Marston, MO 63866 | $118,021 |
| 13 | Gary Lee Kenedy | Matthews, MO 63867 | $115,603 |
| 14 | Michael Lynn Odom | Wardell, MO 63879 | $113,908 |
| 15 | Julie L Aycock | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $111,239 |
| 16 | Porter Farms | Catron, MO 63833 | $111,228 |
| 17 | Taylor Farms | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $110,750 |
| 18 | Jason E Cope Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $107,477 |
| 19 | Randy Lawfield Farms | Kewanee, MO 63860 | $103,933 |
| 20 | Barry Richardson Sr | Marston, MO 63866 | $103,564 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf