Conservation Reserve Program in Saint Charles County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 118
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Saint Charles County, Missouri totaled $1,817,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mallard Point Farms LLC | Clayton, MO 63105 | $222,996 |
| 2 | Sandfort Farms Inc | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $133,302 |
| 3 | Manche Real Estate Pslp II | Ballwin, MO 63022 | $106,882 |
| 4 | John R Timmermann | Saint Louis, MO 63128 | $88,988 |
| 5 | Kahuna Land Co | Saint Louis, MO 63141 | $85,836 |
| 6 | Flint Hill Farm Ptr | Saint Louis, MO 63141 | $66,632 |
| 7 | Hans Wiemann Revocable Trust | Saint Louis, MO 63141 | $54,102 |
| 8 | Zelma J Greathouse | Saint Louis, MO 63119 | $52,546 |
| 9 | Susan Mcmenamy Mcfadden Trust | Bradenton, FL 34212 | $50,518 |
| 10 | Shelby H Curlee III | Mesa, AZ 85205 | $46,199 |
| 11 | William S Knowles | Chesterfield, MO 63017 | $43,779 |
| 12 | Jane T Perna Revocable Trust | Chesterfield, MO 63005 | $43,475 |
| 13 | Loehr Investments Inc | Ballwin, MO 63022 | $41,618 |
| 14 | Barwise Hunt Club LLC | Saint Peters, MO 63376 | $40,145 |
| 15 | Steepleview Farm LLC | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $36,833 |
| 16 | Mark A Beckham | Foristell, MO 63348 | $35,631 |
| 17 | Dr Vincent & Jane Perna | Chesterfield, MO 63005 | $35,567 |
| 18 | Seven Oaks Farm Inc | Saint Peters, MO 63376 | $34,132 |
| 19 | Paul A Rothermich | Wentzville, MO 63385 | $31,983 |
| 20 | Arlie G Schemmer Revocable Living Trust | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $31,637 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf