Emergency Conservation Program in Saint Louis County, Missouri, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 31

Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Saint Louis County, Missouri totaled $420,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Emergency Conservation Program
1995-2021
1Thomas J Teson Rev TrustHazelwood, MO 63042$118,351
2Fred E Willbrand Rev TrustSaint Charles, MO 63301$61,115
3Earl StolteMaryland Heights, MO 63043$33,317
4Gary R KuetemannSaint Louis, MO 63138$27,959
5Raymond Kuetemann Revocable TrustChesterfield, MO 63006$23,345
6Philip Willbrand Revocable TrustSaint Charles, MO 63301$22,795
7Walter J Graeler & SonsChesterfield, MO 63005$17,230
8John C MustermanWarrenton, MO 63383$16,867
9Joseph H KeevenBridgeton, MO 63044$16,200
10Thomas Fred WillbrandSaint Charles, MO 63301$15,386
11Richard HoelscherSaint Louis, MO 63138$11,729
12Creve Coeur Airpt Improvement CorSaint Louis, MO 63146$10,096
13Melvin FickChesterfield, MO 63005$7,679
14Thomas R MckeeverPacific, MO 63069$5,436
15City Of St LouisSaint Louis, MO 63103$3,999
16William Beckman SrSaint Louis, MO 63136$3,911
17Edwin M HaeffnerSaint Louis, MO 63138$3,719
18Willbrand Grain Farms LLCSaint Charles, MO 63301$2,810
19Robert L HaeffnerSaint Louis, MO 63138$2,583
20Marjorie Jo Fitzgerald Rv Liv TrSaint Louis, MO 63127$2,301

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag