Emergency Conservation Program in Scott County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 40
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Scott County, Missouri totaled $486,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gilpin Farms Llp | Scott City, MO 63780 | $110,862 |
2 | Urhahn Farms | Benton, MO 63736 | $71,510 |
3 | Michael George Vetter | Benton, MO 63736 | $44,414 |
4 | John Niederkorn | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $27,750 |
5 | Aaron Burger | Scott City, MO 63780 | $25,802 |
6 | Hopper Farms LLC | Scott City, MO 63780 | $24,827 |
7 | Jones Land Company | Oran, MO 63771 | $20,994 |
8 | Alice Olson | Saint Louis, MO 63105 | $18,208 |
9 | Bob Michael | Commerce, MO 63742 | $17,499 |
10 | Terry Dehart | Scott City, MO 63780 | $11,496 |
11 | Triple B Partnership | Oran, MO 63771 | $10,867 |
12 | Mark A And Connie S Siebert - Siebert Farms | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $10,518 |
13 | Essner Brothers Farms | Benton, MO 63736 | $8,626 |
14 | Douglas Brucker | Benton, MO 63736 | $6,617 |
15 | Conley Laster | Scott City, MO 63780 | $6,594 |
16 | David Gilpin | Scott City, MO 63780 | $6,288 |
17 | Norman Joseph Heuring Jr | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $5,618 |
18 | Kenneth Michael Burger Burger Rv Trust U/a/d Ausgu | Scott City, MO 63780 | $5,120 |
19 | Burger Planting Co | Oran, MO 63771 | $4,974 |
20 | Burger Farm Company Inc | Scott City, MO 63780 | $4,636 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>