Total Commodity Programs in Shelby County, Missouri, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 540
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Shelby County, Missouri totaled $11,472,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Curtis Dee Smith | Shelbyville, MO 63469 | $329,271 |
| 2 | David Michael Vannoy | Shelbyville, MO 63469 | $326,795 |
| 3 | David A Chinn | Clarence, MO 63437 | $280,150 |
| 4 | Jody Ann Chinn | Clarence, MO 63437 | $280,150 |
| 5 | Kevin Chinn | Clarence, MO 63437 | $267,233 |
| 6 | Lance Alan Trenhaile | Shelbyville, MO 63469 | $235,682 |
| 7 | Threlkeld Farming LLC | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $218,685 |
| 8 | Steven Bruce Peoples | Leonard, MO 63451 | $203,399 |
| 9 | Curtis James Douglass | Shelbyville, MO 63469 | $198,460 |
| 10 | Jim Ed Beall | Lentner, MO 63450 | $196,745 |
| 11 | Michael Wayne Novinger | Shelbyville, MO 63469 | $180,395 |
| 12 | M & T Farming LLC | Leonard, MO 63451 | $166,612 |
| 13 | Rodney Dale Gander | Shelbyville, MO 63469 | $150,779 |
| 14 | Carroll Family Farms Inc | Clarence, MO 63437 | $149,476 |
| 15 | Richard Lee Kemp | Clarence, MO 63437 | $143,824 |
| 16 | Charles A Snider | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $136,912 |
| 17 | Thomas L Gill | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $134,416 |
| 18 | David Maurice Farrell | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $132,479 |
| 19 | Bobby Joe Myers | Bethel, MO 63434 | $130,090 |
| 20 | Carroll Brothers Farms LLC | Clarence, MO 63437 | $128,971 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf