Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 10,880
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Montana totaled $159,204,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Stockman Bank ** | Conrad, MT 59425 | $4,022,030 |
2 | Independence Bank ** | Havre, MT 59501 | $1,443,513 |
3 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $1,044,647 |
4 | First Community Bank ** | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $980,024 |
5 | Northwest Farm Credit Service ** | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $583,021 |
6 | Springwater Colony Inc | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $455,413 |
7 | Hilldale Colony Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $416,975 |
8 | Patriot Farms | Billings, MT 59107 | $362,833 |
9 | Torgerson Farms Partnership | Ethridge, MT 59435 | $357,001 |
10 | Big Rose Colony Inc | Shelby, MT 59474 | $344,576 |
11 | Brown Farms Of Montana | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $336,567 |
12 | Riverview Colony Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $323,782 |
13 | Mac's Farm | Dutton, MT 59433 | $316,283 |
14 | Neufeld Farms Partnership | Larslan, MT 59244 | $301,188 |
15 | Cool Spring Colony Inc | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $300,906 |
16 | Twin Hills Colony Inc | Carter, MT 59420 | $300,597 |
17 | Big Sky Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $300,333 |
18 | Horizon Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $299,160 |
19 | Hidden Lake Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $292,069 |
20 | Hill Top Colony Inc | Stockett, MT 59480 | $280,045 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>