Total Commodity Programs in Glacier County, Montana, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 409
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Glacier County, Montana totaled $13,524,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stockman Bank ** | Conrad, MT 59425 | $1,171,357 |
| 2 | Big Sky Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $755,284 |
| 3 | Seville Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $701,450 |
| 4 | Horizon Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $523,826 |
| 5 | Hidden Lake Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $497,825 |
| 6 | Glacier Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $431,121 |
| 7 | Northwest Farm Credit Service ** | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $361,099 |
| 8 | Glendale Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $329,432 |
| 9 | Zenith Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $292,883 |
| 10 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $250,551 |
| 11 | Growing Green Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $226,438 |
| 12 | Blue Skies Farms Inc | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $211,552 |
| 13 | Rumney Ranch | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $183,630 |
| 14 | Vermulm Farms, Inc. | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $172,270 |
| 15 | Wade Swenson | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $159,851 |
| 16 | Eney Farms 2015 | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $158,628 |
| 17 | Rock Creek Farm Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $157,784 |
| 18 | Eney Family Farms | Kalispell, MT 59904 | $154,124 |
| 19 | Mountain Breeze Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $153,776 |
| 20 | South Milk River Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $151,388 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf