Total Disaster Programs in Hill County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,488
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Hill County, Montana totaled $33,367,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aageson Grain & Cattle | Gildford, MT 59525 | $668,129 |
| 2 | Gildford Hutterian Brethren Inc | Gildford, MT 59525 | $362,257 |
| 3 | Chippewa Cree Tribe | Box Elder, MT 59521 | $344,483 |
| 4 | R Land Inc | Stanford, MT 59479 | $325,316 |
| 5 | Solberg Ag | Box Elder, MT 59521 | $292,286 |
| 6 | North Gildford Hutterian Brethren | Gildford, MT 59525 | $289,426 |
| 7 | Osterbauer Hutterian Brethren Inc | Gildford, MT 59525 | $283,552 |
| 8 | Wolery Farms Inc | Inverness, MT 59530 | $252,422 |
| 9 | G & D Farms Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $248,292 |
| 10 | Milk River Hutterian Brethern Inc | Gildford, MT 59525 | $245,250 |
| 11 | Willow Creek Ranch Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $236,763 |
| 12 | Hadford Farm Partnership | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $230,299 |
| 13 | Meland Farms Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $229,184 |
| 14 | Metzger Land & Livestock Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $225,690 |
| 15 | Nick Aageson | Havre, MT 59501 | $225,315 |
| 16 | Kenneth Kops | East Helena, MT 59635 | $217,041 |
| 17 | Lasalle Ranch Inc | Box Elder, MT 59521 | $214,066 |
| 18 | Roy Solberg | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $206,187 |
| 19 | D Han Inc | Inverness, MT 59530 | $203,386 |
| 20 | Henke Land & Grain | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $201,055 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf