SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in Roosevelt County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 233
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in Roosevelt County, Montana totaled $8,726,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wesley Peterson | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $286,576 |
| 2 | Siri H Peterson | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $286,564 |
| 3 | Houg Farms Inc | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $281,169 |
| 4 | Smith Farms | Poplar, MT 59255 | $235,763 |
| 5 | Traeholt Farms | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $225,469 |
| 6 | Zimmerman Inc | Sidney, MT 59270 | $216,341 |
| 7 | Kelly S Toavs | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $195,516 |
| 8 | Duane S Nygaard | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $171,326 |
| 9 | Lawrence Monson | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $157,953 |
| 10 | Dennis D Nelson | Bainville, MT 59212 | $154,631 |
| 11 | William H Beck | Poplar, MT 59255 | $142,539 |
| 12 | Brown Farms Of Montana | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $141,576 |
| 13 | Kjos Farms Inc | Brockton, MT 59213 | $141,368 |
| 14 | Willard A Toavs | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $132,230 |
| 15 | Sr Ranch Inc | Poplar, MT 59255 | $129,822 |
| 16 | Alvy Beck | Homestead, MT 59242 | $110,991 |
| 17 | Patricia Beck | Poplar, MT 59255 | $104,350 |
| 18 | James Dahlberg | Brockton, MT 59213 | $100,000 |
| 19 | Wagner Harmon | Bainville, MT 59212 | $100,000 |
| 20 | Swank & Son Inc | Poplar, MT 59255 | $100,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf