Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Nebraska, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 54,031

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Nebraska totaled $1,970,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2023
1Niewohner Farming EnterpriseAlbion, NE 68620$2,219,683
2Kaliff FarmsYork, NE 68467$2,089,187
3Sandahl FarmsWakefield, NE 68784$2,001,466
4Tri-s AgMerna, NE 68856$1,705,226
5H R W Farm PartnershipFriend, NE 68359$1,637,620
6Marsh FarmsHartington, NE 68739$1,503,628
7Danielski Harvesting & FarmingValentine, NE 69201$1,337,531
8Merna Valley AgMerna, NE 68856$1,334,536
9Sundog PartnershipHoldrege, NE 68949$1,200,839
10Scheinost FarmsPage, NE 68766$1,121,255
11Murdoch PartnershipOrleans, NE 68966$1,070,739
12Aden Diversified Ag PartnershipGothenburg, NE 69138$1,045,917
13Stromberger & Sons PartnershipImperial, NE 69033$1,039,694
14C J Farms Gen PtnrHoldrege, NE 68949$1,032,509
15Andersen Family FarmsDakota City, NE 68731$992,264
16Schiff PartnershipAlliance, NE 69301$981,811
17Taylor Farms General PartnershipAmes, NE 68621$972,356
18J D Hirschfeld & SonsBenedict, NE 68316$969,401
19Orville Hoffschneider & SonsWaco, NE 68460$954,663
20Niobrara FarmsAtkinson, NE 68713$923,701

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag