Market Loss Assistance Program in Nebraska, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 81,546
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Nebraska totaled $1,314,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kaliff Farms | York, NE 68467 | $771,668 |
2 | C J Farms Gen Ptnr | Holdrege, NE 68949 | $666,765 |
3 | Niobrara Farms | Atkinson, NE 68713 | $579,619 |
4 | Danielski Harvesting & Farming | Valentine, NE 69201 | $556,052 |
5 | Associated Foxley Partnership | La Jolla, CA 92038 | $548,951 |
6 | Kason Farms | North Platte, NE 69103 | $448,623 |
7 | Osantowski Bros | Bellwood, NE 68624 | $441,400 |
8 | H R W Farm Partnership | Friend, NE 68359 | $419,447 |
9 | Glenn Elting & Sons | Edgar, NE 68935 | $415,506 |
10 | Merrill Land Company Gen Ptnrship | Ogallala, NE 69153 | $415,261 |
11 | Marsh Farms | Hartington, NE 68739 | $402,872 |
12 | Western Nebraska Farm Company A G | Venango, NE 69168 | $397,557 |
13 | Bartlett Partnership | Bartlett, NE 68622 | $393,500 |
14 | Wallinger Farm Partnership | Stuart, NE 68780 | $369,460 |
15 | Reynolds Farms | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $364,136 |
16 | Woitaszewski Brothers Jv | Wood River, NE 68883 | $359,264 |
17 | J D Hirschfeld & Sons | Benedict, NE 68316 | $355,777 |
18 | Kracl Family Partnership | Oneill, NE 68763 | $353,284 |
19 | Kirkholm Farms | South Sioux City, NE 68776 | $334,430 |
20 | Moore Farms | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $328,054 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>