Total Commodity Programs in New Hampshire, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 193
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in New Hampshire totaled $1,415,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $143,298 |
2 | Forbes Family Partnership Dba Forbes Farm Partners | Lancaster, NH 03584 | $88,885 |
3 | Putnam Farms Inc | Charlestown, NH 03603 | $53,633 |
4 | Scrutons Dairy Inc | Farmington, NH 03835 | $47,755 |
5 | Tullando Farm Inc | Orford, NH 03777 | $46,366 |
6 | Macglaflin Farm LLC | Claremont, NH 03743 | $46,116 |
7 | Chickering Farm Inc | Westmoreland, NH 03467 | $41,152 |
8 | Pine Lane Farm LLC | Contoocook, NH 03229 | $40,075 |
9 | Stuart Farm LLC | Stratham, NH 03885 | $39,163 |
10 | Morrill Farm Dairy LLC | Penacook, NH 03303 | $38,798 |
11 | Bohanan Farm | Contoocook, NH 03229 | $38,025 |
12 | Hatchland Farm LLC | North Haverhill, NH 03774 | $36,061 |
13 | Highway View Farm LLC | Boscawen, NH 03303 | $35,179 |
14 | Fernald Farm Dairy LLC | Nottingham, NH 03290 | $32,941 |
15 | Richard Morris | Haverhill, NH 03765 | $31,340 |
16 | Charles White & Sons | Colebrook, NH 03576 | $31,097 |
17 | Briar Stone Farm LLC | North Haverhill, NH 03774 | $28,221 |
18 | Windyhurst Farm Partnership | Westmoreland, NH 03467 | $27,643 |
19 | Leclair Acres | Claremont, NH 03743 | $26,443 |
20 | Daniel Sanborn | Gilmanton, NH 03237 | $24,065 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>