Conservation Reserve Program in New Mexico, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 997
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in New Mexico totaled $13,378,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citizens Bank | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $236,258 |
| 2 | Farm Credit Of New Mexico ** | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $138,143 |
| 3 | Ag New Mexico Fcs Pca ** | Clovis, NM 88101 | $123,501 |
| 4 | Danny & Terri Fish | Melrose, NM 88124 | $100,000 |
| 5 | Gary And Beverly Lockmiller | Clovis, NM 88101 | $100,000 |
| 6 | First United Bank ** | Seagraves, TX 79359 | $97,949 |
| 7 | Gregory A And Gayle Nash | Melrose, NM 88124 | $80,246 |
| 8 | J Stanley And Cathy Fury | Broadview, NM 88112 | $80,142 |
| 9 | Carol Gunnels | Clovis, NM 88101 | $79,096 |
| 10 | Chase Roberts | Melrose, NM 88124 | $77,025 |
| 11 | Citizens Bank Of Clovis | Clovis, NM 88102 | $76,137 |
| 12 | Ww Farms & Ranch | San Jon, NM 88434 | $70,589 |
| 13 | Palla Terra | Clovis, NM 88101 | $69,241 |
| 14 | Deanna Lockmiller & Michael Booty | Clovis, NM 88101 | $66,232 |
| 15 | American Heritage Bank ** | Melrose, NM 88124 | $63,135 |
| 16 | Donald F & Vicky L Smith General Partnership | Melrose, NM 88124 | $61,170 |
| 17 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $58,315 |
| 18 | Bank Of Clovis ** | Clovis, NM 88101 | $57,315 |
| 19 | Rex & Kathy Rush | Clovis, NM 88101 | $56,824 |
| 20 | Alice R Schlagal | Midland, TX 79707 | $56,316 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf