Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Catron County, New Mexico, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 72
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Catron County, New Mexico totaled $1,376,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | F-d Cattle Company LLC | Globe, AZ 85501 | $68,551 |
2 | Robert Payne | Clifton, TX 76634 | $63,001 |
3 | Nelson Shirley | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $58,820 |
4 | Marvin & Dorothy Ake Revocable Trust | Magdalena, NM 87825 | $52,191 |
5 | Badger Creek Corporation | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $51,511 |
6 | Nelda Rae Mcphaul | Pie Town, NM 87827 | $49,555 |
7 | Ghost Lake Corporation | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $44,816 |
8 | 77 Investments LLC | Datil, NM 87821 | $42,944 |
9 | Marinel J Poppie | Glenwood, NM 88039 | $40,459 |
10 | Glen Mccarty Revocable Trust | Reserve, NM 87830 | $38,718 |
11 | 7d Holding Company | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $38,055 |
12 | Joel T Nelson | Glenwood, NM 88039 | $37,649 |
13 | Whitehouse Ranch Inc | Datil, NM 87821 | $36,710 |
14 | John Cauzza | Quemado, NM 87829 | $33,486 |
15 | Henry D Wellborn | Datil, NM 87821 | $31,657 |
16 | Buster Green | Quemado, NM 87829 | $29,699 |
17 | Kck Investments LLC | Mesa, AZ 85212 | $29,307 |
18 | Audrey Mcqueen | Luna, NM 87824 | $28,568 |
19 | Powell Ranch Partnership | Aragon, NM 87820 | $26,545 |
20 | Hugh B Mckeen Jr | Glenwood, NM 88039 | $24,971 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>