Margin Protection Program in Niagara County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 20
Recipients of Margin Protection Program from farms in Niagara County, New York totaled $202,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Margin Protection Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Atwater Farms | Barker, NY 14012 | $35,488 |
2 | Gasport View Dairy Farms Inc | Gasport, NY 14067 | $30,501 |
3 | Jj Smith Farms LLC | Middleport, NY 14105 | $28,532 |
4 | Verratti Farms LLC | Gasport, NY 14067 | $27,735 |
5 | Austin Farms LLC | Lyndonville, NY 14098 | $26,238 |
6 | Niagara View Farms | Niagara Falls, NY 14304 | $13,166 |
7 | Loho Farms LLC | Sanborn, NY 14132 | $12,469 |
8 | Bulinski Farms | Middleport, NY 14105 | $5,391 |
9 | Stahl Dairy Farm | Akron, NY 14001 | $4,109 |
10 | Haseley Brothers Farm | Sanborn, NY 14132 | $3,983 |
11 | Maple View Dairy | Appleton, NY 14008 | $3,284 |
12 | David N Schmitt | Lockport, NY 14094 | $2,272 |
13 | Daniel A Schmitt | Lockport, NY 14094 | $2,272 |
14 | Aquilina Farm | Lockport, NY 14094 | $2,053 |
15 | Karl Kowalski | Lockport, NY 14094 | $1,772 |
16 | Tina Kowalski | Lockport, NY 14094 | $1,772 |
17 | Robert A Stahl | Akron, NY 14001 | $538 |
18 | Mitchell Stahl | Akron, NY 14001 | $538 |
19 | Nelson Haseley | Sanborn, NY 14132 | $120 |
20 | Jill L Haseley | Sanborn, NY 14132 | $120 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>