Farm Subsidy information
North Carolina
Total Subsidies in North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 171,023
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in North Carolina totaled $9,398,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $19,568,002 |
2 | Amd Farms | Hobgood, NC 27843 | $12,185,215 |
3 | Fann Farms | Salemburg, NC 28385 | $11,667,792 |
4 | Cox Brothers Farms | Monroe, NC 28112 | $10,881,899 |
5 | Anderson Farms | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $10,273,827 |
6 | Howard Farms | Deep Run, NC 28525 | $9,856,521 |
7 | Harrell And Owens Farm | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $9,446,215 |
8 | Whitehurst Farms Ptns | Conetoe, NC 27819 | $9,386,515 |
9 | Dunlow And Dunlow | Gaston, NC 27832 | $9,292,829 |
10 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $9,261,736 |
11 | Lancaster Properties | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $8,847,268 |
12 | James E Jr And Wanda H Howard | Deep Run, NC 28525 | $8,195,767 |
13 | Bailey Brothers Farms | Bailey, NC 27807 | $7,877,604 |
14 | 3 B Farms Partnership | Pinetown, NC 27865 | $7,773,218 |
15 | Keel Brothers Farms | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $7,613,599 |
16 | Fulcher Brothers Farm | Ernul, NC 28527 | $7,560,005 |
17 | Battleboro Ag Partnership | Battleboro, NC 27809 | $7,528,361 |
18 | Walton Farms | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $7,304,761 |
19 | Farless & Sons | Merry Hill, NC 27957 | $7,238,979 |
20 | The Williamson Farm | Mount Gilead, NC 27306 | $7,174,734 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>