Total Commodity Programs in North Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 13,969
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in North Carolina totaled $174,235,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $2,825,719 |
2 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $1,687,925 |
3 | Agcarolina Farm Credit ** | Elizabeth City, NC 27906 | $551,192 |
4 | Agrarian Inc | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $529,221 |
5 | Keel Brothers Farms | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $476,067 |
6 | Battleboro Ag Partnership | Battleboro, NC 27809 | $444,534 |
7 | Price Brothers Farming Inc | Mount Olive, NC 28365 | $438,411 |
8 | Vandemark Farms LLC | Spring Hope, NC 27882 | $429,914 |
9 | Fann Farms | Salemburg, NC 28385 | $415,292 |
10 | Wf Partnership | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $392,122 |
11 | Farless & Sons | Merry Hill, NC 27957 | $383,925 |
12 | Turf Mountain Sod Inc | Hendersonville, NC 28792 | $381,813 |
13 | Benton Blueberries LLC | Ivanhoe, NC 28447 | $362,858 |
14 | Miller Partnership | Gatesville, NC 27938 | $359,998 |
15 | King's Greenhouses, Inc. | Monroe, NC 28110 | $357,971 |
16 | Rest-a-bit Farms | Pinetops, NC 27864 | $351,311 |
17 | Blueberry Bay LLC | Ivanhoe, NC 28447 | $349,526 |
18 | Sunny Side Partnership | Colerain, NC 27924 | $312,909 |
19 | Southern Bank And Trust Company ** | Murfreesboro, NC 27855 | $300,654 |
20 | Mcgee Farms | Severn, NC 27877 | $287,300 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>