Total Commodity Programs in Chatham County, North Carolina, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 275
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Chatham County, North Carolina totaled $2,732,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Horney Livestock Company | Siler City, NC 27344 | $376,889 |
| 2 | Phillips Farms | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $154,017 |
| 3 | Benjamin W Dunlap | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $108,159 |
| 4 | Jerry W Crawford | Chapel Hill, NC 27516 | $84,459 |
| 5 | B & F Farms Of Nc, LLC | Sanford, NC 27330 | $81,813 |
| 6 | Brush Creek Swiss Farm | Siler City, NC 27344 | $60,573 |
| 7 | Keith A Tuttle Farms Inc | Siler City, NC 27344 | $60,412 |
| 8 | Moore Cattle Company LLC | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $51,971 |
| 9 | Neill Lindley | Snow Camp, NC 27349 | $47,985 |
| 10 | Manco Farm Inc | Pittsboro, NC 27312 | $46,295 |
| 11 | R D Lee Farms Inc | Erwin, NC 28339 | $46,175 |
| 12 | Travis Wayne Buchanan | Sanford, NC 27330 | $45,960 |
| 13 | Robert Peter Dowd III | Goldston, NC 27252 | $44,571 |
| 14 | Josh White | Siler City, NC 27344 | $43,792 |
| 15 | Billy Joe Gaddy & Walter K Gaddy | Snow Camp, NC 27349 | $41,339 |
| 16 | Ronald L Teague | Siler City, NC 27344 | $40,143 |
| 17 | Paul W Price | Goldston, NC 27252 | $37,672 |
| 18 | William Robert Fitts III | Siler City, NC 27344 | $34,149 |
| 19 | Clyde R Perry Jr | Siler City, NC 27344 | $31,373 |
| 20 | A Parker Culberson | Siler City, NC 27344 | $27,477 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf