Total Commodity Programs in Macon County, North Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 53
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Macon County, North Carolina totaled $66,164 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | J W Mitchell Farms Inc | Franklin, NC 28734 | $11,913 |
| 2 | Adam Lee Huscusson And Harold Arthur Huscusson H A | Franklin, NC 28734 | $8,092 |
| 3 | Osage Farms Inc | Scaly Mountain, NC 28775 | $6,109 |
| 4 | Karl E Gillespie | Franklin, NC 28734 | $2,761 |
| 5 | Emma Parrish Odell | Otto, NC 28763 | $2,583 |
| 6 | Stanley E Penland Jr | Franklin, NC 28734 | $2,561 |
| 7 | Tellico Enterprises Inc | Franklin, NC 28734 | $2,496 |
| 8 | Alexander Denison Dba Otter Creek Trout Farm | Topton, NC 28781 | $2,476 |
| 9 | Philip Scruggs | Franklin, NC 28734 | $2,301 |
| 10 | Franklin Flower Farm | Franklin, NC 28734 | $1,624 |
| 11 | Latresa Downs | Franklin, NC 28734 | $1,325 |
| 12 | John Curtis Brown | Franklin, NC 28734 | $1,295 |
| 13 | James T Ledford | Otto, NC 28763 | $1,283 |
| 14 | Richard Gibson | Franklin, NC 28734 | $1,159 |
| 15 | Seay's Farm & Garden, Inc | Franklin, NC 28734 | $1,085 |
| 16 | Barry W Bateman | Franklin, NC 28734 | $1,005 |
| 17 | Mitchell Owenby | Franklin, NC 28734 | $997 |
| 18 | Nancy Bateman | Otto, NC 28763 | $969 |
| 19 | Kenneth N Mccaskill | Franklin, NC 28734 | $908 |
| 20 | Jason Lee Boston | Whittier, NC 28789 | $831 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf