Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Wilson County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 167
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Wilson County, North Carolina totaled $579,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rock Ridge Farm Partnership | Wilson, NC 27893 | $55,305 |
2 | Vick Family Farms Partnership | Wilson, NC 27896 | $44,165 |
3 | Scott Farms Inc | Lucama, NC 27851 | $31,666 |
4 | Lancaster Properties | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $28,519 |
5 | Marion L Pridgen Farms Inc | Wilson, NC 27894 | $26,799 |
6 | Bass Family Farms LLC | Lucama, NC 27851 | $25,713 |
7 | Tyner Farms Partners | Elm City, NC 27822 | $21,190 |
8 | Williford Sons LLC | Elm City, NC 27822 | $17,587 |
9 | David Bunting & Sons Inc | Elm City, NC 27822 | $16,469 |
10 | Sullivan Farms Inc | Lucama, NC 27851 | $15,119 |
11 | Todd Glover Farms Inc | Wilson, NC 27896 | $11,983 |
12 | Batts Farms | Elm City, NC 27822 | $10,698 |
13 | Scott Brothers Inc | Lucama, NC 27851 | $9,992 |
14 | Stallings Farm | Walstonburg, NC 27888 | $9,017 |
15 | R J Hinnant & Sons Farms | Kenly, NC 27542 | $8,760 |
16 | Richard A Aycock Farms Inc | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $8,407 |
17 | Agrarian Inc | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $8,383 |
18 | Zack R Bissette Jr | Elm City, NC 27822 | $8,181 |
19 | Jean M Bissette | Elm City, NC 27822 | $8,181 |
20 | Rose Farm Joint Venture | Nashville, NC 27856 | $8,090 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>