Total Commodity Programs in Wilson County, North Carolina, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 215
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Wilson County, North Carolina totaled $12,290,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Vick Family Farms Partnership | Wilson, NC 27896 | $1,268,672 |
2 | Scott Farms Inc | Lucama, NC 27851 | $742,821 |
3 | R B Lancaster & Sons Inc | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $662,791 |
4 | Sharp Farms Inc | Sims, NC 27880 | $605,073 |
5 | Lancaster Properties | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $562,277 |
6 | Sullivan Farms Inc | Lucama, NC 27851 | $495,982 |
7 | Marion L Pridgen Farms Inc | Wilson, NC 27894 | $490,686 |
8 | Rock Ridge Farm Partnership | Wilson, NC 27893 | $453,337 |
9 | Hocutt Farms Inc | Sims, NC 27880 | $402,587 |
10 | Jeff Barnes LLC | Lucama, NC 27851 | $379,484 |
11 | Scott Brothers Inc | Lucama, NC 27851 | $357,401 |
12 | Gerald Tyner Jr Farms Inc | Elm City, NC 27822 | $347,733 |
13 | William R Williamson | Wilson, NC 27895 | $317,549 |
14 | Agcarolina Farm Credit ** | Elizabeth City, NC 27906 | $279,211 |
15 | R J Hinnant & Sons Farms | Kenly, NC 27542 | $274,229 |
16 | Fresh Pik Produce Inc | Kenly, NC 27542 | $254,214 |
17 | Bass Family Farms LLC | Lucama, NC 27851 | $208,456 |
18 | Tyner Farms Partners | Elm City, NC 27822 | $207,254 |
19 | Triple J Produce Inc | Wilson, NC 27893 | $164,605 |
20 | Webb Family Farms LLC | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $162,252 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>