Conservation Reserve Program in North Dakota, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 12,535
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in North Dakota totaled $67,087,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Agcountry Farm Credit Services ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $266,574 |
2 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $161,700 |
3 | Bremer Bank ** | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $160,104 |
4 | Farm Credit Services Of Nd ** | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $145,835 |
5 | Quandt Brothers | Oakes, ND 58474 | $110,580 |
6 | Commercial Bank Of Mott ** | Mott, ND 58646 | $82,505 |
7 | Dana Huether Farm Ptr | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $81,034 |
8 | Spirit Lake Tribe | Fort Totten, ND 58335 | $79,777 |
9 | Glinz Family Limited Partnership | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $74,272 |
10 | First United Bank ** | Park River, ND 58270 | $73,631 |
11 | Quick Farms | Dazey, ND 58429 | $73,063 |
12 | Sobak Farms | Fairdale, ND 58229 | $71,528 |
13 | Sargent County Bank ** | Havana, ND 58043 | $70,675 |
14 | Wayne Nusviken | Mccanna, ND 58251 | $70,467 |
15 | Weinreis Brothers | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $69,093 |
16 | Kay L & Michelle E Currier Jv | Fargo, ND 58102 | $68,536 |
17 | Thorsgard Sunrise Acres | Northwood, ND 58267 | $66,570 |
18 | Brummund Family Partnership | Oakes, ND 58474 | $63,630 |
19 | Keith D Johnson | Cavalier, ND 58220 | $63,355 |
20 | Hansen M/s Jv | Guelph, ND 58474 | $59,122 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>