Loan Deficiency in Morton County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 881
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Morton County, North Dakota totaled $22,946,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rodney Warren Rusch | New Salem, ND 58563 | $369,627 |
2 | Leslie Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $348,987 |
3 | Lance Eugene Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $329,066 |
4 | Charles A Mork | Mandan, ND 58554 | $319,237 |
5 | Mitch Arnold Kuhn | Mandan, ND 58554 | $291,897 |
6 | Miles John Schantz | Hebron, ND 58638 | $236,334 |
7 | Terrance James Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $233,726 |
8 | Kenneth A Schmidt | Solen, ND 58570 | $232,006 |
9 | Chester M Schantz | Hebron, ND 58638 | $222,890 |
10 | Rudolph Ervin Peltz | New Salem, ND 58563 | $217,746 |
11 | Glenn Gerving | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $206,355 |
12 | John J Hatzenbuhler | Mandan, ND 58554 | $193,497 |
13 | Roger Otto Kinnischtzke | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $193,299 |
14 | Beierlein Brothers | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $192,340 |
15 | Kevin Michael Opp | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $188,896 |
16 | Bryan Russell Hoesel | New Salem, ND 58563 | $187,869 |
17 | Craig Leonard Heinert | Mandan, ND 58554 | $179,055 |
18 | Dale Craig Heinle | Hebron, ND 58638 | $177,218 |
19 | Kevin Leo Miller | Flasher, ND 58535 | $176,929 |
20 | Larry Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $176,197 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>