Total Commodity Programs in Auglaize County, Ohio, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 856
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Auglaize County, Ohio totaled $5,917,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | K & K Dairy Inc | Botkins, OH 45306 | $139,945 |
2 | Phillips Farms III | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $124,252 |
3 | Howard Homan Farms Inc | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $118,983 |
4 | David Harold Homan | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $104,635 |
5 | Kevin E Fisher | Botkins, OH 45306 | $97,780 |
6 | Jeremy W Elsass, Quietcove Farm Holstein | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $97,715 |
7 | Bornhorst Dairy Inc | Fort Loramie, OH 45845 | $83,756 |
8 | Settlage & Settlage Partnership | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $80,269 |
9 | Michael P Smith | New Knoxville, OH 45871 | $75,675 |
10 | Lane Hill Farm LLC | Minster, OH 45865 | $68,684 |
11 | John Heitkamp | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $67,689 |
12 | Dahlinghaus Farms LLC | Minster, OH 45865 | $65,711 |
13 | Alan Brown | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $63,790 |
14 | Koeper Farms LLC | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $62,711 |
15 | Dan W Koenig | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $57,980 |
16 | Louis Brown | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $57,896 |
17 | John J Fisher- Dba J&s Farms | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $57,221 |
18 | Bailey Family Farms LLC | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $55,883 |
19 | Jay Elshoff, Golden Hills Farm | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $55,869 |
20 | Richard L Steinke Mapl-valle Farms | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $54,381 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>