Total Commodity Programs in Fayette County, Ohio, 2019

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 445

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $14,883,000 in in 2019.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
2019
1Bryant Agricultural EnterpriseWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$670,743
2Scmc PartnershipLeesburg, OH 45135$422,676
3Miller Farms General PartnershipWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$320,534
4Fred W MelvinBloomingburg, OH 43106$264,909
5Thompson Creek Farms IncSouth Solon, OH 43153$261,236
6Sollars FarmsWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$257,023
7Bonham Farms LLCWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$241,160
8Gregory Gene GustinWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$240,400
9Todd GustinWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$240,400
10Fannin Ag. LLCWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$222,631
11Ricketts Farm IncJeffersonville, OH 43128$222,241
12Johnny T PendletonNew Holland, OH 43145$206,100
13Montcrest FarmsWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$197,971
14Garth HynesWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$191,929
15Whitney Grain And Cattle LLCBloomingburg, OH 43106$173,052
16David Dwight DuffNew Holland, OH 43145$172,780
17John C PersingerWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$164,211
18Waddle Family Farms Operating LLCWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$156,976
19Schaefer Family Farms LLCBloomingburg, OH 43106$156,961
20Davidson Farms IncWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$155,555

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag