Direct Payment Program in Wyandot County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,209
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Wyandot County, Ohio totaled $38,329,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ohio Family Farms | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $1,359,101 |
2 | G & J Koehler Farms | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $550,833 |
3 | K & K Farms | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $492,147 |
4 | Rcj Sheaffer Partnership | Morral, OH 43337 | $446,308 |
5 | James D Schilling | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $418,225 |
6 | Leslie Family Trust-james Leslie | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $377,726 |
7 | C H Mccarthy Corporation | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $334,029 |
8 | Ronald L Walters | Forest, OH 45843 | $327,350 |
9 | Reile And Co | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $322,241 |
10 | Ed Needs | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $319,250 |
11 | William Warren Osborn | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $312,392 |
12 | Matthew L Smalley | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $311,445 |
13 | George F Rellinger | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $304,980 |
14 | Alan E Richards | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $285,701 |
15 | Gary Walter | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $279,997 |
16 | Gary Huffman | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $277,036 |
17 | Eric G Benson | Nevada, OH 44849 | $266,700 |
18 | Lyle Weaver | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $266,475 |
19 | Emery Walton | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $264,239 |
20 | Ralph F Culver | Harpster, OH 43323 | $262,640 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>