Total Commodity Programs in Umatilla County, Oregon, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 921
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Umatilla County, Oregon totaled $6,012,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madison Ranches Inc | Echo, OR 97826 | $170,722 |
| 2 | Roloff Farms Inc | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $144,312 |
| 3 | H T Rea Farming Corp | Milton Freewater, OR 97862 | $125,913 |
| 4 | Terjeson Ranches | Helix, OR 97835 | $118,338 |
| 5 | Jones & Jones Ranches | Helix, OR 97835 | $111,131 |
| 6 | Lht Farming Company | Adams, OR 97810 | $107,163 |
| 7 | B L Davis Ranch Inc | Adams, OR 97810 | $90,628 |
| 8 | Newtson Farms | Helix, OR 97835 | $87,131 |
| 9 | Wkt Farming | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $79,767 |
| 10 | Stanfield Hutterian Brethren | Stanfield, OR 97875 | $77,904 |
| 11 | Brd Farming | Adams, OR 97810 | $72,651 |
| 12 | Snow Farms LLC | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $72,301 |
| 13 | Agrigrow | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $67,239 |
| 14 | Bracher Farms | Helix, OR 97835 | $64,721 |
| 15 | Ctuir | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $61,199 |
| 16 | 4 Moore Farms Gp | Kahlotus, WA 99335 | $58,430 |
| 17 | P J Rohde Ranch Inc | Echo, OR 97826 | $52,059 |
| 18 | Snow Ranches | Echo, OR 97826 | $51,935 |
| 19 | Dallas Ranch Partnership | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $48,357 |
| 20 | Hill Leasing LLC | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $47,763 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf