Total Commodity Programs in Orangeburg County, South Carolina, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 282
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Orangeburg County, South Carolina totaled $13,490,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ag South Farm Credit Aca ** | Douglas, GA 31534 | $522,873 |
2 | Gregg Covington Farms Partnership | Norway, SC 29113 | $464,471 |
3 | Dantzler Farms Part | Santee, SC 29142 | $460,977 |
4 | Riley Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $447,531 |
5 | Mclaurin Farms | Elloree, SC 29047 | $447,360 |
6 | Donald Allen Riddle | Norway, SC 29113 | $360,937 |
7 | Arbor One Aca ** | Florence, SC 29502 | $338,213 |
8 | Strock Farms Partnership | Elloree, SC 29047 | $333,751 |
9 | Alva W Dannelly Jr | Norway, SC 29113 | $324,876 |
10 | Ted Shuler & Sons | Santee, SC 29142 | $313,204 |
11 | Jameson Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $309,923 |
12 | Jjj Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $304,241 |
13 | H E & J B Shuler & Sons | Holly Hill, SC 29059 | $251,864 |
14 | Shady Grove Plantation Nurs Inc | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $246,258 |
15 | Berry Dairy Farms LLC | Bowman, SC 29018 | $232,443 |
16 | Roy M Hungerpiller III | Cameron, SC 29030 | $222,784 |
17 | Hutto Brothers Partnership | Holly Hill, SC 29059 | $215,966 |
18 | Russell Farms Part | Holly Hill, SC 29059 | $199,038 |
19 | Seven Oaks Farm | North, SC 29112 | $196,614 |
20 | Traywick And Son Farm | Cope, SC 29038 | $195,944 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>