Total Commodity Programs in Richland County, South Carolina, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 54
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Richland County, South Carolina totaled $1,797,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cottle Holdings Inc | Florence, SC 29501 | $284,180 |
2 | H Heath Hill And Son | Eastover, SC 29044 | $250,230 |
3 | Gonzales' Land & Timber LLC | Columbia, SC 29201 | $177,832 |
4 | Ray G Hill | Gadsden, SC 29052 | $141,432 |
5 | Southland Fisheries Corporation | Hopkins, SC 29061 | $105,288 |
6 | Long Branch Farm Nursery LLC | Eastover, SC 29044 | $100,643 |
7 | H Heath Hill | Eastover, SC 29044 | $87,841 |
8 | Three Sisters Produce LLC | Columbia, SC 29201 | $80,263 |
9 | City Roots LLC | Columbia, SC 29205 | $70,487 |
10 | Bruces Greenhouses Inc. | Blythewood, SC 29016 | $65,141 |
11 | Toms Creek Family Farms, LLC | Columbia, SC 29201 | $46,910 |
12 | Jason Carter | Eastover, SC 29044 | $46,333 |
13 | Gl&t LLC | Columbia, SC 29201 | $45,569 |
14 | William O Hill | Eastover, SC 29044 | $34,618 |
15 | Swamp Fox Agriculture LLC | Eastover, SC 29044 | $31,206 |
16 | Carolina Crepe Myrtle & Shade Tre | Hopkins, SC 29061 | $26,805 |
17 | Lanham Farms Partnership | Eastover, SC 29044 | $23,533 |
18 | Willie H Sharpe Jr | Eastover, SC 29044 | $20,202 |
19 | Jason Carter Farms LLC | Eastover, SC 29044 | $18,675 |
20 | Eagle Creek Nurseries LLC | Cayce, SC 29033 | $14,997 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>