Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 285
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $2,332,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | David James Folsland | Oldham, SD 57051 | $242,232 |
2 | Bradley Steffensen | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $188,217 |
3 | Scott Mark Steffensen | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $143,544 |
4 | Matthew T Deknikker | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $140,912 |
5 | John Emil Albrecht | De Smet, SD 57231 | $110,031 |
6 | Fast View Farms | Huron, SD 57350 | $62,360 |
7 | Wilkinson Ranch Inc | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $62,244 |
8 | James Wendell Folsland | Sioux Falls, SD 57104 | $48,472 |
9 | Loryn Gehm | De Smet, SD 57231 | $40,846 |
10 | Peckenpaugh Ranch Inc | Carthage, SD 57323 | $37,339 |
11 | E Weerts Inc | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $36,009 |
12 | Kyle Gross | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $34,363 |
13 | Hi Spirit Ranch Inc | De Smet, SD 57231 | $28,389 |
14 | Judd D Fox | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $24,886 |
15 | Frank E Virchow | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $22,725 |
16 | Robert Timp | De Smet, SD 57231 | $19,825 |
17 | Richard P Baier | De Smet, SD 57231 | $19,371 |
18 | Paul Larson | De Smet, SD 57231 | $19,341 |
19 | John Coughlin | De Smet, SD 57231 | $17,053 |
20 | Lionel E Miller | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $16,305 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>