Conservation Reserve Program in Lake County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 198
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Lake County, South Dakota totaled $1,028,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kingbrook Rural Water System Inc | Arlington, SD 57212 | $62,652 |
2 | Mary C Frey | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $45,187 |
3 | Barbara J Hyland | Ramona, SD 57054 | $38,430 |
4 | Neal Mcintyre | Winfred, SD 57076 | $36,081 |
5 | Barry Brown | Tea, SD 57064 | $35,262 |
6 | Kathryn-kathryn E. Clark Grantor Trust Elizabeth C | Volga, SD 57071 | $34,970 |
7 | Albert Yager | Madison, SD 57042 | $26,886 |
8 | Schaffer Family Trust Irrevocable | Hartford, SD 57033 | $21,683 |
9 | Donald Deragisch Trust | Ramona, SD 57054 | $20,867 |
10 | Clarence J Bortnem | Volga, SD 57071 | $20,858 |
11 | Rhon M Anderson | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $18,722 |
12 | Farm Credit Services Of America ** | Lawton, IA 51030 | $17,339 |
13 | Brad Baumgartner | Harrisburg, SD 57032 | $17,178 |
14 | Alvine Family Limited Partnership | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $16,586 |
15 | Round Barn Farms | Winfred, SD 57076 | $15,777 |
16 | Roger-roger L. Clark Grantor Trust Lowell Clark | Volga, SD 57071 | $15,651 |
17 | Marshall Four Partnership | Dallas, TX 75209 | $15,188 |
18 | James W Maher | Rutland, SD 57057 | $14,392 |
19 | Alan Bortnem | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $13,888 |
20 | Thomas W Hansen | Winfred, SD 57076 | $12,907 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>