Loan Deficiency in Lincoln County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,657
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Lincoln County, South Dakota totaled $40,914,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dwayne Kerwin Pederson | Worthing, SD 57077 | $431,875 |
| 2 | Evelyn June Pederson | Worthing, SD 57077 | $430,603 |
| 3 | Hyronimus Farms Inc | Worthing, SD 57077 | $333,099 |
| 4 | Darwin Albers | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $326,294 |
| 5 | Alan Enger | Harrisburg, SD 57032 | $309,296 |
| 6 | Saddle Creek Farms Inc | Beresford, SD 57004 | $306,726 |
| 7 | Willow Ridge Farms Inc | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $299,033 |
| 8 | Mark Allen Kroger | Canton, SD 57013 | $296,931 |
| 9 | Bill Crevier And Jerry Crevier Pt | Chancellor, SD 57015 | $294,357 |
| 10 | Zweifel Brothers Inc | Beresford, SD 57004 | $290,830 |
| 11 | Interstate Farms | Inwood, IA 51240 | $258,430 |
| 12 | S & M Farms Inc | Canton, SD 57013 | $257,575 |
| 13 | Gubbrud Farms Inc | Alcester, SD 57001 | $248,700 |
| 14 | Gregory Lee Slack | Harrisburg, SD 57032 | $231,780 |
| 15 | James Harley Cole | Hudson, SD 57034 | $214,928 |
| 16 | Jason Derek Van Den Top | Canton, SD 57013 | $211,581 |
| 17 | Kirk David Rikansrud | Canton, SD 57013 | $205,300 |
| 18 | Sherwood James Beek | Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | $199,922 |
| 19 | Cedar Lawn Farm | Worthing, SD 57077 | $195,483 |
| 20 | Ronald William Albers | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $195,058 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf