Emergency Conservation Program in Stanley County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 119
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Stanley County, South Dakota totaled $982,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Triple U Enterprises | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $56,817 |
2 | Triple U Inc | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $37,197 |
3 | Larry Mcquistion | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $36,269 |
4 | Tim & Diane Olson Partnership | Hayes, SD 57537 | $35,886 |
5 | Mervin Petersen | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $35,789 |
6 | Prince & Sons Inc | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $35,017 |
7 | Richard Doud | Midland, SD 57552 | $34,757 |
8 | James Carter | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $30,397 |
9 | Northstream Investments Inc | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $30,036 |
10 | Michael M Nemec | Midland, SD 57552 | $27,194 |
11 | Norman J Stoeser | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $24,004 |
12 | Don Kirkpatrick | Midland, SD 57552 | $20,362 |
13 | Gene Stoeser | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $20,000 |
14 | R & D Tibbs Inc | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $20,000 |
15 | Miller-mathews Partnership | Midland, SD 57552 | $19,254 |
16 | Clifford Tibbs | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $19,069 |
17 | Frank L Miller Sr | Hayes, SD 57537 | $17,673 |
18 | Mark Dennis Hanson | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $17,193 |
19 | Clinton L Caldwell | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $16,713 |
20 | Michael L Mcquistion | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $16,459 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>