Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Todd County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 84
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Todd County, South Dakota totaled $751,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Antelope Creek Organics | Mission, SD 57555 | $78,013 |
2 | Darla Lyn Assman | Mission, SD 57555 | $76,124 |
3 | Daniel J Gudgel | Valentine, NE 69201 | $46,051 |
4 | Michael Scott Assman | Mission, SD 57555 | $41,219 |
5 | David Assman | Mission, SD 57555 | $31,802 |
6 | Chauncey Ranch LLC | Carter, SD 57580 | $26,989 |
7 | Terry Dean Denny | Winner, SD 57580 | $21,693 |
8 | Schneider Brothers Llp | Kilgore, NE 69216 | $17,424 |
9 | Tayler Assman | Mission, SD 57555 | $16,246 |
10 | Gary Garvin | Valentine, NE 69201 | $16,166 |
11 | Haase & Sons Inc | Valentine, NE 69201 | $14,702 |
12 | Gayle E Tinant | Valentine, NE 69201 | $14,210 |
13 | Gordon Assman | Mission, SD 57555 | $12,819 |
14 | Gunnink Farm Inc | Crookston, NE 69212 | $12,099 |
15 | Michael Vavra | Crookston, NE 69212 | $11,919 |
16 | Patsy Baker | Valentine, NE 69201 | $10,757 |
17 | Shawn M Klein | Mission, SD 57555 | $10,733 |
18 | L B Haase And Sons Inc | Valentine, NE 69201 | $10,659 |
19 | Clyde Brewer | Kilgore, NE 69216 | $10,341 |
20 | M & G Heinert Inc | Parmelee, SD 57566 | $10,148 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>