Total Commodity Programs in Union County, South Dakota, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 663
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $15,043,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Steven Harold Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $236,577 |
2 | Homestead Farms LLC | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $231,898 |
3 | Allen James Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $228,119 |
4 | Frank Raymond Minor | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $213,954 |
5 | Dene Arthur Doty | Alcester, SD 57001 | $205,431 |
6 | Larry Donald Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $202,812 |
7 | David Michael Staum | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $194,175 |
8 | Patrick Vincent Walsh | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $189,732 |
9 | Van Ballegooyen Brothers Inc | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $189,062 |
10 | Adam Holmes Rozell | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $188,998 |
11 | Todd David Larsen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $186,117 |
12 | Heckathorn Fms Inc | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $163,371 |
13 | Craig Wilken | Akron, IA 51001 | $162,982 |
14 | Lawrence Stanley Donnelly | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $162,953 |
15 | Heeren Farms Partnership | Akron, IA 51001 | $149,492 |
16 | Melvin Thomas Donnelly | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $146,661 |
17 | Matthew Michael Schmitz | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $144,510 |
18 | Dennis John Chicoine | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $144,257 |
19 | Scott Joseph Hanson | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $135,130 |
20 | Charles Craig Nygard | Akron, IA 51001 | $130,097 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>