Counter Cyclical Program in Colorado County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 665
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Colorado County, Texas totaled $10,379,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | M Plus Land Co | Eagle Lake, TX 77434 | $383,764 |
2 | Engstrom Bros | Garwood, TX 77442 | $301,884 |
3 | Cook Farms A Joint Venture | Eagle Lake, TX 77434 | $249,312 |
4 | Man Farming Company J V | Eagle Lake, TX 77434 | $181,907 |
5 | Wiese Brothers | Eagle Lake, TX 77434 | $174,554 |
6 | Wintermann 2003 Joa | Eagle Lake, TX 77434 | $150,564 |
7 | Kenneth Mahalitc Inc | Eagle Lake, TX 77434 | $147,659 |
8 | Leblanc Farms Jv | Richmond, TX 77406 | $146,980 |
9 | Wintermann 2002 Joa | Eagle Lake, TX 77434 | $129,626 |
10 | Jrj Farms | El Campo, TX 77437 | $113,520 |
11 | Robert Abell Farms Jv | Garwood, TX 77442 | $103,110 |
12 | Gold Farms | Garwood, TX 77442 | $102,012 |
13 | Shimek Farms | Garwood, TX 77442 | $101,177 |
14 | Donald Leopold Farms | Nada, TX 77460 | $96,986 |
15 | Swoboda Bros | Garwood, TX 77442 | $93,081 |
16 | Guthman Farms | Lissie, TX 77454 | $91,892 |
17 | Sunset Joint Venture | East Bernard, TX 77435 | $87,784 |
18 | J & L Ranch | Garwood, TX 77442 | $82,956 |
19 | R Gold Farming Joint Venture | El Campo, TX 77437 | $82,894 |
20 | Triple A Farming Co | Eagle Lake, TX 77434 | $76,940 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>