Total Commodity Programs in Colorado County, Texas, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 659
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Colorado County, Texas totaled $15,324,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | First National Bank Of Eagle Lake ** | Eagle Lake, TX 77434 | $1,739,324 |
2 | Caushatta Cattle Company LLC | Eagle Lake, TX 77434 | $858,160 |
3 | First State Bank ** | Louise, TX 77455 | $647,189 |
4 | Engstrom Bros | Garwood, TX 77442 | $439,656 |
5 | Andrew Heinsohn | New Ulm, TX 78950 | $421,160 |
6 | Hauerland Cattle Company, LLC | Columbus, TX 78934 | $414,175 |
7 | Beken Livestock Inc | Weimar, TX 78962 | $339,650 |
8 | Columbus State Bank ** | Columbus, TX 78934 | $290,438 |
9 | Ewald Friedrich Jr | Weimar, TX 78962 | $265,492 |
10 | Arthur Mahalitc & Sons Inc | Eagle Lake, TX 77434 | $255,005 |
11 | Glueck Tree Farm Inc | Cat Spring, TX 78933 | $245,185 |
12 | Blue Goose Farms | Garwood, TX 77442 | $201,778 |
13 | The First State Bank ** | Columbus, TX 78934 | $186,365 |
14 | Robert Abell Farms Jv | Garwood, TX 77442 | $184,670 |
15 | Gold Farms | Garwood, TX 77442 | $179,543 |
16 | Lehrer Affiliates | Garwood, TX 77442 | $172,840 |
17 | Trefny Cattle | Weimar, TX 78962 | $161,769 |
18 | Danklefs Farms | Garwood, TX 77442 | $151,553 |
19 | Jeffery J Dugie | Nada, TX 77460 | $147,252 |
20 | 52 Farms | Garwood, TX 77442 | $127,725 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>