Total Conservation Programs in Hidalgo County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 45
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Hidalgo County, Texas totaled $483,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Homer Gomez | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $49,111 |
2 | Linda Gomez | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $49,111 |
3 | Kotzur Farms | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $35,999 |
4 | Nandanavanam LLC | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $27,300 |
5 | A A Garza Ltd | Austin, TX 78747 | $22,208 |
6 | Matias Xavier Pena | Edinburg, TX 78542 | $20,898 |
7 | Diana G Pena | Edinburg, TX 78542 | $20,898 |
8 | Jose G Guerra | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $20,629 |
9 | Mary H Gwin | Wichita Falls, TX 76308 | $18,534 |
10 | Buena Fe LLC | Linn, TX 78563 | $16,649 |
11 | Jerome Kotzur 2004 Trust | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $16,150 |
12 | Richard Kotzur Jr 2004 Trust | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $16,150 |
13 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $14,172 |
14 | Dsc Genesis Farms LLC | Wellington, TX 79095 | $12,054 |
15 | Tula Ranch Trust | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $10,343 |
16 | Proxey K Prukop Family Ltd | Mission, TX 78572 | $9,665 |
17 | Joseph Leon Sekula | Edinburg, TX 78542 | $8,517 |
18 | Gaffney Family Living Trust | Houston, TX 77257 | $8,182 |
19 | Rosa Corona | Pharr, TX 78577 | $7,696 |
20 | Fidela G Reed | Austin, TX 78750 | $7,132 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>