Total Commodity Programs in Lubbock County, Texas, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,709
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Lubbock County, Texas totaled $43,704,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | City Bank ** | Lubbock, TX 79408 | $2,109,887 |
2 | Peoples Bank ** | Lorenzo, TX 79343 | $1,541,687 |
3 | Kitten Land Co | Slaton, TX 79364 | $1,465,755 |
4 | Vista Bank Of Texas ** | Ralls, TX 79357 | $1,192,106 |
5 | Vardeman Farms Ptnship | Slaton, TX 79364 | $758,135 |
6 | Thomas Kennedy Thomas Farms | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $738,566 |
7 | Agtexas Fcs ** | Brownfield, TX 79316 | $607,504 |
8 | Prosperity Bank ** | El Campo, TX 77437 | $565,022 |
9 | 4j Prosperity LLC | Abernathy, TX 79311 | $547,732 |
10 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $542,191 |
11 | Martin & Mimms Farms | Lorenzo, TX 79343 | $519,821 |
12 | First State Bank Abernathy ** | Abernathy, TX 79311 | $419,000 |
13 | Tim & Dana Ford Jv | Lubbock, TX 79415 | $378,927 |
14 | Kitchens & Kitchens | Slaton, TX 79364 | $368,442 |
15 | American Bank Of Commerce ** | Wolfforth, TX 79382 | $354,318 |
16 | Alan & Amy West Farms | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $334,376 |
17 | Lone Star State Bank Of West Texa ** | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $314,743 |
18 | Reimer Farms Gp | Lubbock, TX 79416 | $312,477 |
19 | Ed & Connye Teal Farms | New Deal, TX 79350 | $274,951 |
20 | Patschke Land & Cattle Inc | Lubbock, TX 79403 | $259,839 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>