Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Starr County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 234
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $436,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | San Felipe Outfitters Lp | Mcallen, TX 78501 | $90,480 |
2 | F M Cattle Co | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $15,525 |
3 | Don Cameron Jr | Jourdanton, TX 78026 | $14,168 |
4 | Raul Villarreal | Delmita, TX 78536 | $14,125 |
5 | Kyle Ruppert | Edinburg, TX 78540 | $11,520 |
6 | F & T Farms And Cattle Co | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $8,234 |
7 | Arnulfo J Garza | Pharr, TX 78577 | $7,363 |
8 | Ociel Mendoza Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $7,196 |
9 | Exiquio Saenz | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $7,055 |
10 | G L And C LLC | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $6,477 |
11 | El Triangulo Cattle Co | Roma, TX 78584 | $6,227 |
12 | J & R Feedlot LLC | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $5,559 |
13 | Lauro H & Dora M Salinas Trust | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $5,510 |
14 | Jaime T Villarreal | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $5,437 |
15 | Alberto Martinez | Roma, TX 78584 | $5,400 |
16 | Eugene S Mackie Family Limited Partnership | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $4,658 |
17 | Jorge E Falcon | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $4,468 |
18 | Norberto Salinas | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $4,434 |
19 | Leonel Lopez III | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $4,422 |
20 | Ana Lisa Garza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $4,244 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>