Total Disaster Programs in Starr County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,083
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $28,996,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Chapotal Farms | Mcallen, TX 78502 | $1,016,274 |
2 | Cotton And Grain Producers | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $877,958 |
3 | My Three Daughters Farms | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $854,457 |
4 | F & T Farms And Cattle Co | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $793,055 |
5 | Wesley J Vanderpool | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $752,770 |
6 | El Triangulo Cattle Co | Roma, TX 78584 | $584,329 |
7 | Jorge Luis Saenz | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $553,419 |
8 | Don Cameron Jr | Jourdanton, TX 78026 | $495,448 |
9 | Eusebio Saenz Jr | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $488,529 |
10 | G & H Farms | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $488,490 |
11 | Cj Farms | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $480,562 |
12 | Legacy Advance Development Partners Ltd | Roma, TX 78584 | $477,318 |
13 | Aracely Vanderpool | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $389,039 |
14 | Respondek Farms | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $366,885 |
15 | Tomas E Villarreal | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $354,915 |
16 | Raul Villarreal | Delmita, TX 78536 | $345,532 |
17 | F M Cattle Co | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $333,521 |
18 | Rene Gonzalez | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $259,806 |
19 | Alvarez Brothers Farming And Truc | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $240,571 |
20 | Paula R Garcia | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $236,206 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>